Re: [w3c/webcomponents] document.close doesn't need CEReactions (#597)

@bzbarsky yeah, though the whole reason we are specifying [CEReactions] is because user agents want us to tell them those optimizations since they all want to implement them. Otherwise we could have done with a simple tweak to IDL's algorithms. But perhaps it's indeed not worrying about APIs like this too much.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/597#issuecomment-256850676

Received on Friday, 28 October 2016 07:01:30 UTC