Re: [whatwg/streams] Reference promise spec definitions (#554)

> But what about upon-fulfillment's syntax?

IMO it's fine as-is; people should be able to understand what's meant if you omit the "with v".

> Out of curiosity, has literally any spec found promise-calling usable in their contexts? It's defined as a gerund instead of an imperative verb, making it awkward to use, and it seems extremely limited in utility.

All specs that use Web IDL promise callbacks use it, which is quite a few. But they do not use the definition directly; instead they use Web IDL's callback invocation mechanisms which perform similar steps.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/554#issuecomment-256140058