- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:10:11 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/pull/205/review/5696504@github.com>
domenic approved this pull request. > <ol class="algorithm"> 1. If |I| was not declared with a [{{Constructor}}] [=extended attribute=], then <a lt="es throw">throw a <emu-val>TypeError</emu-val></a>. + 1. If |newTarget| is <emu-val>undefined</emu-val>, then ES notation is just "NewTarget", not "|newTarget|". > @@ -10366,13 +10368,11 @@ is the [=interface=]: |I|. </ol> -If the internal \[[Call]] method -of the [=interface object=] -returns normally, then it must -return an object that implements interface |I|. +If evaluating the [=function object=] |F| returns normally, +then it must return an object that implements interface |I|. Hmm. This requirement is a little strange, both before and after. I think what it is trying to say is instead "If the actions listed in the description of _constructor_ return normally, then they must return an object that implements interface _I_." > -The internal \[[Call]] method -of the interface object behaves as follows, assuming -|arg|<sub>0..|n|−1</sub> is the list -of argument values passed to the constructor, and |I| -is the [=interface=]: +Interfaces that do not have a constructor will throw Maybe "interfaces that are not declared with a [Constructor] extended attribute will throw when called, both as a function and as a constructor." -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/205#pullrequestreview-5696504
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2016 17:10:40 UTC