Re: [whatwg/fetch] Realm for "package data" (#400)

I think we should stick with the plan in https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/135 as that will be least disruptive. It will only require people to specify the realm when they're doing something asynchronous (i.e. not the sync consequence of a method or constructor call). In that case maybe having a term like "allocate" is good, and then we'd say "allocate an object _x_ using interface _I_ in realm _r_". Otherwise people can say "allocate an object _x_ using interface _I_" or any of their current imprecise phrasings.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/400#issuecomment-256047057