- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:42:11 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 21 October 2016 01:42:42 UTC
Having looked at the [previous discussion around this](https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/669), we wanted the same for `ServiceWorkerMessageEvent` at the beginning. Later, for `ExtendableMessageEvent`, we had a reason not having been able to extend `MessageEvent`. I think even if we merge `ServiceWorkerMessageEvent` and `MessageEvent` at this time, we anyway have to maintain `ExtendableMessageEvent` interface separately as it's not a `MessageEvent`. Considering they have been shipped for a while, I'm inclined to regard them as pair of events defined in SW spec. /cc @jakearchibald -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/989#issuecomment-255272962
Received on Friday, 21 October 2016 01:42:42 UTC