Re: [whatwg/streams] Marking promise rejections as handled (#547)

> Can we come up with clear and reasonable criteria (guideline) for deciding whether or not to use this? The phrase "state promises" looks to be capturing the scope well, but still sounds a bit vague.

My intent was indeed to come up with such a criteria. By "state promises" I mean something like "properties that are promises that reflect some state change". In general for such promises, I would expect that every time you reject them (including creating them in a rejected state), you mark them as handled.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/547#issuecomment-254867277