- From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 05:58:43 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2016 12:59:50 UTC
> The specification complexity would be making that duplicate key check and then throwing? Or whatever they want to do in the duplicate case. @jyasskin is probably right that spec authors won't even realize they should handle it, so it probably does make sense to handle in IDL. It just makes me a bit sad that ES proxies don't enforce this themselves per spec. :( -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/180#issuecomment-254804744
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2016 12:59:50 UTC