- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 13:06:16 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2016 20:06:46 UTC
> This is ugly and I was wondering what to do about it. I think the best pattern for that is this one: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/blob/ba1e784ec2761fa7e992c80e1c3ef0f10b991ce1/reference-implementation/to-upstream-wpts/writable-streams/bad-underlying-sinks.js#L51-L64 > Is it okay for the spec to use w3.org/.../promises-guide as the definition for that terminology? Yeah; that's stated in https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#conventions. We should probably work to make them link to their definitions. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/532#issuecomment-253323143
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2016 20:06:46 UTC