- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:39:25 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2016 07:39:55 UTC
Apologies, I got confused and you are correct. I rebased the PR and applied some minor nit fixes. I have two questions: 1. Is @rniwa now okay with this approach? 2. We're sure no specification relies on the return value of dispatch (when relatedTarget is set somehow) and would get tripped up by it not returning anything here? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/336#issuecomment-253141397
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2016 07:39:55 UTC