- From: Adam Rice <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 21:24:12 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2016 04:24:50 UTC
ricea commented on this pull request.
> +
+ const ws = recordingWritableStream({
+ close() {
+ throw error1;
+ }
+ });
+
+ const writer = ws.getWriter();
+
+ return promise_rejects(t, error1, writer.close(), 'close() promise must reject with the thrown error')
+ .then(() => promise_rejects(t, error1, writer.ready, 'ready promise must reject with the thrown error'))
+ .then(() => {
+ assert_array_equals(ws.events, ['close']);
+ });
+
+}, 'Underlying sink close: throwing method');
I found when I was porting tests that it was easy to see what a test was for when it was phrased in terms of requirements. I think this is important when looking for gaps in testing coverage.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/526
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2016 04:24:50 UTC