- From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 02:53:56 -0700
- To: whatwg/encoding <encoding@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2016 09:54:30 UTC
@ricea > I am assuming that `TextDecoder` will never be a subclass of `TransformStream` It could be. If that isn't possible, there could be a behind-the-scenes `TransformStream` and its writable and readable are bound on `TextDecoder`. Turning `TextDecoder` into a full transform stream would be my preference, but maybe I'm missing the blocker. Ideally `.decode`/`.encode` would be respecced to use the underlying transform stream. The tricky bit is (as far as I can tell) is allowing the legacy methods to synchronously return. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/72#issuecomment-251345088
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2016 09:54:30 UTC