Re: [w3c/pointerlock] pointerlockchange is cancelable, breaking the processing model (#9)

If I understand this correctly it feels like an editorial issue. That said, it would help if we had tests that demonstrate this implicit behaviour - @scheib do we have such a thing?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/issues/9#issuecomment-251134934

Received on Monday, 3 October 2016 15:18:15 UTC