Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] (WIP) Bikeshed cleanup (#1014)

jungkees commented on this pull request.



> @@ -765,7 +716,7 @@ spec: rfc7231; urlPrefix: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231
         <tr>
           <td><dfn event id="service-worker-container-controllerchange-event"><code>controllerchange</code></dfn></td>
           <td>{{Event}}</td>
-          <td>The <a for="ServiceWorkerContainer">service worker client</a>'s <a>active service worker</a> changes. (See step 9.2 of the <a href="#activation-algorithm">Activate</a> algorithm. The <a href="#dfn-skip-waiting-flag">skip waiting flag</a> of a <a href="#dfn-service-worker">service worker</a> causes <a href="#activation-algorithm">activation</a> of the <a href="#dfn-service-worker-registration">service worker registration</a> to occur while <a href="#dfn-service-worker-client">service worker clients</a> are <a href="#dfn-use">using</a> the <a href="#dfn-service-worker-registration">service worker registration</a>, {{ServiceWorkerContainer/controller|navigator.serviceWorker.controller}} immediately reflects the <a href="#dfn-active-worker">active worker</a> as the <a href="#dfn-service-worker">service worker</a> that <a href="#dfn-control">controls</a> the <a href="#dfn-service-worker-client">service worker client</a>.)</td>
+          <td>The <a for="ServiceWorkerContainer">service worker client</a>'s <a>active service worker</a> changes. (See step 9.2 of the <a>Activate</a> algorithm. The <a>skip waiting flag</a> of a <a for="/">service worker</a> causes <a lt="activate">activation</a> of the <a for="/">service worker registration</a> to occur while <a for="/">service worker clients</a> are <a>using</a> the <a for="/">service worker registration</a>, {{ServiceWorkerContainer/controller|navigator.serviceWorker.controller}} immediately reflects the <a>active worker</a> as the <a for="/">service worker</a> that <a>controls</a> the <a for="/">service worker client</a>.)</td>

Yes, this will help a lot for both discussion and writing.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1014