Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] The promises returned by skipWaiting() should have more consistent activation-waiting behavior and not call Activate() multiple times (#1015)

Test-wise, I [audited](https://github.com/asutherland/asuth-gecko-notes/blob/43249976a7bb81b0b2dc1a89407b5452dc9a4290/service-workers/e10s-effort/skip-waiting-notes.md) the tests and found only https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/blob/16255016561889e88a1537d2365becfe8a9339b4/service-workers/service-worker/skip-waiting-installed.https.html#L21 makes any assumptions about skipWaiting() providing guarantees about activation having occurred.  All other uses of skipWaiting() separately wait for activation to occur.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1015#issuecomment-263471949