- From: Eero Häkkinen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 04:31:51 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 25 November 2016 12:32:22 UTC
I so no reason not to use <code>File</code> objects. Somehow I did not thought about that. A <code>File</code> object make much more sense. Only parts with a filename are parsed into <code>Blob</code>/<code>File</code> objects thus there are no reason to use a more limited <code>Blob</code> objects instead of more complete <code>File</code> objects. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/392#issuecomment-262948398
Received on Friday, 25 November 2016 12:32:22 UTC