- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 23:09:26 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 25 November 2016 07:09:59 UTC
> I removed the "storage considerations" section. It felt redundant as it's all handled by other specs. It seems we can keep Storage Considerations with some non-normative words? People tend to ask what happens if the storage with the Cache API gets full. Yeah, I agree better wording's needed to keep it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1014#issuecomment-262893494
Received on Friday, 25 November 2016 07:09:59 UTC