Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] (WIP) Bikeshed cleanup (#1014)

Ok, it's in a somewhat better shape now.

Here are the intentional (larger) changes I made

* I removed the "storage considerations" section. It felt redundant as it's all handled by other specs.
* I changed all the `<em class="rfc2119" title="MUST">` style rfc2119 references to be plain `<em>`. The semantics of these terms are covered elsewhere.
* Removed reference to sysapps "alarms" API
* "script resource map", "scope to registration map" are now an infra maps
* I've updated examples to use newer ES features like arrow functions
* We had a few instances of `return <a>context object</a>’s <a>relevant settings object</a> <var>client</var>`, were `client` wasn't used. I replaced these with `return <a>context object</a>’s <a>relevant settings object</a>`


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1014#issuecomment-262830091