- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 05:27:20 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1012/review/9860300@github.com>
jungkees commented on this pull request. > <dl> <dt><em>"<code>classic</code>"</em></dt> - <dd><p><a>Fetch a classic worker script</a> given <var>job</var>’s <a lt="URL serializer">serialized</a> <a href="#dfn-job-script-url">script url</a>, <var>job</var>’s <a href="#dfn-job-client">client</a>, and "<code>serviceworker</code>".</p></dd> + <dd><p><a>Fetch a classic worker script</a> given <var>job</var>’s <a lt="URL serializer">serialized</a> <a href="#dfn-job-script-url">script url</a>, <var>job</var>’s <a href="#dfn-job-client">client</a>, "<code>serviceworker</code>", and the to-be-created <a>environment settings object</a> for this service worker.</p></dd> An environment settings object for each service worker execution changes. [Run Service Worker](https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#run-service-worker-algorithm) step 7 creates one before run the script in step 14. So, I guess we should set the script's settings object slot to the created environment settings object in Run Service Worker. And just pass null to Fetch a classic worker script algorithm's script settings object param here, if that makes sense. For that, additional guards would be needed in _create a classic script_ I guess. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1012#pullrequestreview-9860300
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2016 13:27:52 UTC