- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 18:07:51 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2016 02:08:23 UTC
Good catch! What I can promptly think of is to add steps (between step 5.3 and 5.4) that get the `ServiceWorkerRegistration` object, check its `.active`, and wait in a jump-to-labeled-step-loop until `.active` is set with the `ServiceWorker` for registration's active worker. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1011#issuecomment-262419681
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2016 02:08:23 UTC