Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Lots of bikeshed usage issues (#965)

@jakearchibald, sounds great. One thing I'd like to note is while I was trying to resolve bikeshed linking errors, I removed/changed some of the dfn IDs (in this commit: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/commit/2e802220d13cbea559cbdfa6265162aff1b5a14b). Removing the IDs was mostly around the dfns for IDL attributes and methods, which I thought was needed to use {{Interface/attribute}} notation to reference with. (Not sure whether dropping the IDs wouldn't have been required though.) Changing the IDs was for improving naming consistency, but I think it was not a good idea. Sorry for the confusion. I'll definitely help this cleanup. It seems not breaking the existing urls should be one of the important rules that we should have in mind. Let's sort this out together!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/965#issuecomment-262271686