- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 02:58:42 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1010/review/9639033@github.com>
annevk commented on this pull request.
> @@ -3426,13 +3440,16 @@ spec: rfc7231; urlPrefix: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231
<li>Invoke <a href="#run-service-worker-algorithm">Run Service Worker</a> algorithm with <var>activeWorker</var> as the argument.</li>
<li><a>Queue a task</a> <var>task</var> to run the following substeps:
<ol>
- <li>Create a trusted event <var>e</var> that uses the {{FetchEvent}} interface, with the event type <code><a href="#service-worker-global-scope-fetch-event">fetch</a></code>, which does not bubble.</li>
- <li>Let the {{FetchEvent/request}} attribute of <var>e</var> be initialized to <var>r</var>.</li>
+ <li><a>Create an event</a> <var>e</var> with the {{FetchEvent}} interface.</li>
+ <li>Initialize <var>e</var>’s {{Event/type}} attribute to "<code>fetch</code>".</li>
+ <li>Initialize <var>e</var>’s {{Event/cancelable}} attribute to true.</li>
It just seems that per the original text they were not cancelable. Shouldn't that change be separate or pointed out somehow?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1010
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 10:59:14 UTC