- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 02:48:10 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1010/review/9637272@github.com>
jungkees commented on this pull request.
> @@ -3359,6 +3348,31 @@ spec: rfc7231; urlPrefix: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231
</ol>
</section>
+ <section algorithm="extend-service-worker-lifetime-algorithm">
+ <h3 id="extend-service-worker-lifetime-algorithm" dfn>Extend Service Worker Lifetime</h3>
+
+ <dl>
+ <dt>Input</dt>
+ <dd><var>event</var>, an {{ExtendableEvent}} object</dd>
+ <dt>Output</dt>
+ <dd>None</dd>
+ </dl>
+ <ol>
+ <li>If <var>event</var>'s <a>extend lifetime promises</a> is empty, unset <var>event</var>'s <a>extensions allowed flag</a> and abort these steps.</li>
+ <li>Let <var>extendLifetimePromises</var> be an empty array.</li>
+ <li>Run the following substeps <a>in parallel</a>:
+ <ol>
+ <li><em>SetupPromiseArray</em>: Set <var>extendLifetimePromises</var> to a copy of <var>event</var>'s <a>extend lifetime promises</a>.</li>
Right. That's what we discussed during the TPAC. My plan is to do https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/931#issuecomment-248570852 as a separate work. (This particular PR is for https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/931#issuecomment-248233338).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1010
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 10:49:19 UTC