- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 02:48:10 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1010/review/9637272@github.com>
jungkees commented on this pull request. > @@ -3359,6 +3348,31 @@ spec: rfc7231; urlPrefix: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231 </ol> </section> + <section algorithm="extend-service-worker-lifetime-algorithm"> + <h3 id="extend-service-worker-lifetime-algorithm" dfn>Extend Service Worker Lifetime</h3> + + <dl> + <dt>Input</dt> + <dd><var>event</var>, an {{ExtendableEvent}} object</dd> + <dt>Output</dt> + <dd>None</dd> + </dl> + <ol> + <li>If <var>event</var>'s <a>extend lifetime promises</a> is empty, unset <var>event</var>'s <a>extensions allowed flag</a> and abort these steps.</li> + <li>Let <var>extendLifetimePromises</var> be an empty array.</li> + <li>Run the following substeps <a>in parallel</a>: + <ol> + <li><em>SetupPromiseArray</em>: Set <var>extendLifetimePromises</var> to a copy of <var>event</var>'s <a>extend lifetime promises</a>.</li> Right. That's what we discussed during the TPAC. My plan is to do https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/931#issuecomment-248570852 as a separate work. (This particular PR is for https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/931#issuecomment-248233338). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1010
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 10:49:19 UTC