Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Introduce Extend Service Worker Lifetime algorithm (#1010)

jungkees commented on this pull request.



> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ spec: rfc7231; urlPrefix: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231
     <p>A <a href="#dfn-service-worker">service worker</a> has an associated <dfn id="dfn-type">type</dfn> which is either "<code>classic</code>" or "<code>module</code>". Unless stated otherwise, it is "<code>classic</code>".</p>
     <p>A <a href="#dfn-service-worker">service worker</a> has an associated <dfn id="dfn-containing-service-worker-registration">containing service worker registration</dfn> (a <a href="#dfn-service-worker-registration">service worker registration</a>), which contains itself.</p>
     <p>A <a href="#dfn-service-worker">service worker</a> has an associated <dfn id="dfn-service-worker-id">id</dfn> (an opaque string), which uniquely identifies itself during the lifetime of its <a href="#dfn-containing-service-worker-registration">containing service worker registration</a>.</p>
-    <p>A <a href="#dfn-service-worker">service worker</a> is dispatched a set of <dfn id="dfn-lifecycle-events">lifecycle events</dfn>, <a href="#service-worker-global-scope-install-event">install</a> and <a href="#service-worker-global-scope-activate-event">activate</a>, and <dfn id="dfn-functional-events">functional events</dfn> including <a href="#service-worker-global-scope-fetch-event">fetch</a>.</p>
+    <p>A <a href="#dfn-service-worker">service worker</a> is dispatched a set of <dfn id="dfn-lifecycle-events">lifecycle events</dfn>, <a href="#service-worker-global-scope-install-event">install</a> and <a href="#service-worker-global-scope-activate-event">activate</a>, and <dfn id="dfn-functional-events" for="">functional events</dfn> including <a href="#service-worker-global-scope-fetch-event">fetch</a>.</p>

Without the `for=""`, it generates no dfn found error. So I fixed this specific dfn in the follow-up patch by removing `href="#..."` entirely.

> migrate away from relying on href="#..."

Yes. I'll do this cleanup soon as a separate work.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1010