Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509)

One again, any other element would behave differently from a `script` one.

There's literally nothing else I need to add to my example.

Other cases I have mentioned such `<script is="x-sharder" type="x-shader/x-fragment"></script>` keep being ignored. We can't have a regular conversation if we pick only the convenient part of it and I've already stated my intention contribute in not closing this thread.

Best Regards

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/509#issuecomment-261803821