Re: [w3c/webcomponents] The is="" attribute is confusing? Maybe we should encourage only ES6 class-based extension. (#509)

because it's not the same. My example won't show or do anything if JS is disabledand will put content in the exact place on demand but without synchronous document mutations. On top of that, it would work even for chunks injected asynchronously. It basically replaces `document.write`.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/509#issuecomment-261781339