Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider fetching service worker scripts with no-cache by default (#893)

I'm reviewing gecko code to implement this and came up with a couple questions:

1. I assume this does not change Step 5.3 of Register which short-circuits the registration if its a duplicate of the same script already installed.  Correct?
2. Should we expose a getter on the registration so someone can inspect the value of the `useCache` attribute?
3. Should we allow the `useCache` value to be changed in the install or activate events?

@jakearchibald, what do you think?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/893#issuecomment-260442769

Received on Monday, 14 November 2016 19:51:36 UTC