- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 05:34:32 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 7 November 2016 13:35:04 UTC
Some are mentioned in https://github.com/tc39/proposals/pull/30#issuecomment-252719023 by @domenic: * enumerable (Web IDL) vs. non-enumerable (conventional for ES) * statics being functions (Web IDL) vs. methods (conventional for ES) I believe in Gecko at least typeof will also be different. This means for instance that https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/ cannot be done in IDL and that https://url.spec.whatwg.org/ expressed in TC39-language would have slightly different behavior. That seems suboptimal, especially if there's still hope to eventually bridge the chasm somehow. As a start, having it clearly documented how "normal" platform objects differ from "normal" JavaScript classes would be good. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/226
Received on Monday, 7 November 2016 13:35:04 UTC