- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 07:18:15 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Received on Sunday, 6 November 2016 15:19:26 UTC
@annevk, you are talking about the set of features, whereas @tobie is talking about the set of objects. The set of legacy platform objects is a subset of the set of platform objects, if we define it @tobie's way. Which I think we should. The set of features offered by legacy platform objects is a superset of the set of features offered by platform objects, if we define the set of platform objects as disjoint from the set of legacy platform objects. As far as I can tell @tobie's setup will work well. We might need a third category, global platform objects. But in general non-legacy/non-global platform objects won't override any internal methods, which sounds great. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/202#issuecomment-258687513
Received on Sunday, 6 November 2016 15:19:26 UTC