- From: Mike West <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 07:15:44 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/410/review/7207599@github.com>
mikewest commented on this pull request. > @@ -2393,7 +2393,7 @@ with a <i>CORS flag</i> and <i>recursive flag</i>, run these steps: <a lt="block bad port">should fetching <var>request</var> be blocked due to a bad port</a>, <a href=https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-mixed-content/#should-block-fetch>should fetching <var>request</var> be blocked as mixed content</a>, or - <a href=https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/#should-block-request>should fetching <var>request</var> be blocked by Content Security Policy</a> + [[csp-3#should-block-request]] Hrm. CSP marks up headers as algorithms: ``` <h3 id="foo" algorithm> Foo the bar. </h3> ``` That syntax doesn't seem to export a definition; it does export the header, which the syntax in this patch links to. I agree that the linking text is a little verbose... But CSP would be (even more!) verbose if I added a distinct `<dfn>` with the same text as the heading. @tabatkins: is there a better syntax I should be using? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/410
Received on Friday, 4 November 2016 14:16:16 UTC