- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 02:12:07 -0700
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2016 09:12:34 UTC
I outlined the redefinition of the service worker client concept: https://gist.github.com/jungkees/03d4473ae47bd222539ab9cf5c9afd31 Hooks to HTML's navigation and run a worker will be needed (with some changes to https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/322). In the gist proposal, I suggested we have a single .potentialClientId (with its state defined) over both .reservedClientId and .targetClientId. Please take a look. /cc @annevk @jakearchibald @slightlyoff @mkruisselbrink @wanderview @ehsan --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/870#issuecomment-220269659
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2016 09:12:34 UTC