- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 22:00:47 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2016 05:01:21 UTC
@esprehn that's not very constructive. We went through a lot of names, none of them great and lots of them unlikely to be compatible. Given that this method takes an argument I don't think it's that inconsistent. I guess the alternative is that we simply don't provide it and let libraries fill this gap. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/241#issuecomment-218660752
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2016 05:01:21 UTC