- From: Jonathan Watt <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 15:28:52 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2016 22:29:25 UTC
Ah, right, thanks. Requiring partial interfaces to be annotated with [SecureContext] if their non-partial interface is would be a bit inconvenient for WebIDL authors but would have the advantage of being clearer to anyone reading the WebIDL. I expect more than a few content authors will end up asking themselves "why isn't this thing visible" when the answer is "because it requires a Secure Context", so requiring WebIDL authors to be explicit about this would be good I think. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/119#issuecomment-218609353
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2016 22:29:25 UTC