- From: Gregory Wild-Smith <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 13:44:44 -0700
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2016 20:45:12 UTC
> Terabytes of data in the wild that doesn't adhere to more strict standards needs an interpretation Except, as pointed out repeatedly, it does adhere to that standard because *many major browsers don't support what is proposed*. > For a stricter interpretation, you are welcome to use the IETF RFCs Well yes, I mean if the point of this standard is to just exist with no-one using it or caring about it... that would be a great position to take. If, on the other hand, you want people to actually respect it... then being so obtuse about things is not a great way to go about it. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/118#issuecomment-218584504
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2016 20:45:12 UTC