Re: [whatwg/dom] Provide greater visibility of `implements` relationships? (#249) from Anne van Kesteren on 2016-05-11 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from May 2016)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 03:05:14 -0700
To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
Cc:
Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/249/218416444@github.com>

We could move the "implements" statements to the "interfaces" and add a note below the mixins. I think that is reasonable. HTML has similar faults and there's not really an organized way we go about this.

A mixin is a term IDL will eventually adopt to describe these [NoInterfaceObject] interfaces shared by several "interfaces" (really objects or classes, another thing IDL should eventually change).

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/249#issuecomment-218416444

Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2016 10:05:43 UTC