Re: [heycam/webidl] The [SecureContext] text is unclear on exposure for interfaces (#119)

It's both.

> Does it mean that [SecureContext] implies [NoInterfaceObject] in non-Secure Contexts?

The relevant normative text is http://heycam.github.io/webidl/#dfn-exposed (which explicitly references the "available only in secure contexts" state) and http://heycam.github.io/webidl/#es-interfaces which says that things that are not "exposed" in the `#dfn-exposed` sense do not generate properties on the global.

> Or does it mean that all of an interface's members are only exposed within a secure context? 

The normative text here is http://heycam.github.io/webidl/#SecureContext where it says that for an interface member that doesn't have `[SecureContext]` specified explicitly:

>   The interface member is available only in secure contexts if and only if the interface or partial interface the member is declared on is.

and then back to `#dfn-exposed` referencing this state and the existing infrastructure using `#dfn-exposed` to control existence of properties for interface members.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/119#issuecomment-218277537