Re: [w3c/webcomponents] flatten: true in assignedNodes doesn't make much sense when a slot doesn't have display: contents (#493)

I'm fine with the naming of `composed: true`.

My main concern here is how we should treat 'display: contents". The existence of "display: contents" made the situation complex. That violates our original assumption. However, it's not good idea to let DOM APIs depend on the value of "display: xxx".

Given that, the following might be acceptable:
- We *unwrap* only slots. A slot is already so special in a shadow dom world. That covers most use cases.
- We do not *unwrap* other elements even if they are "display: contents".

Does this make sense?


---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/493#issuecomment-218072835