Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241)

Not that I'm against `getRootNode()`, but was `ownerRoot` discussed before?
It's a bit awkward, but consistent with `ownerDocument`.
On May 5, 2016 19:10, "Ryosuke Niwa" <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> I'm fine with getRootNode.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/241#issuecomment-217197553>
>


---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/241#issuecomment-217215821