- From: Arthur Stolyar <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 02:10:59 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2016 09:11:31 UTC
Hmm.. So `getRootNode()` isn't consistent with `parentNode`, but `findRootNode()` is fine? On May 5, 2016 10:11, "Anne van Kesteren" <notifications@github.com> wrote: > Let's settle on findRootNode() then, pending approval by @hayatoito > <https://github.com/hayatoito> next week. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/241#issuecomment-217091031> > --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/241#issuecomment-217108172
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2016 09:11:31 UTC