Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] caches.match() rejection on missing name is a footgun (#891)

Either way would work for me.  Not creating the cache object seems good.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/891#issuecomment-216911971

Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2016 16:32:34 UTC