Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] caches.match() rejection on missing name is a footgun (#891)

Just to confirm, resolve `undefined` but not implicitly create the cache (i.e. still smarter than the shorthand) ?

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/891#issuecomment-216909258