- From: Maciej Stachowiak <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 01:04:02 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Monday, 2 May 2016 08:04:33 UTC
I'm not sure this will be a web-compatible name either, but what about just `root`? Another possible alternative would be `topNode` instead of `treeTopNode`. Regarding whether the breakage is acceptable: so far the fallout is three broken websites, in some cases severely. This is with fairly limited testing so far. I worry that this means website use of `rootNode` in this hack way might me more widespread, possibly due to some sort of library or shared JS code doing it. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/241#issuecomment-216127930
Received on Monday, 2 May 2016 08:04:33 UTC