Re: [whatwg/storage] Use PermissionState instead of PersistentStoragePermission (#10)

To be clear, Firefox is now shipping the permission API.

I don't see it as likely that we would implement the `StorageManager.persistentPermission()` function since that functionality is better provided through the permission API instead.

I.e. we should not let editorial issues affect what API we use. Ultimately what needs to be defined is what string should be passed to the permission API in order to check permission to use persistent storage. At least until we've gotten the various specs into the needed state to define this formally. I propose using `"persistent-storage"`, but I don't actually care at all what the string is.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/storage/issues/10#issuecomment-204036543