- From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 06:22:55 -0700
- To: w3ctag/spec-reviews <spec-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/109/202891092@github.com>
Hi TAG! Thank you for taking this early opportunity to review the Web Payment WG specs. I suggest focusing on the Payment Request API and the Payment Method Identifiers specs. There are some good TAG questions in their like "what identifiers should we use for payment methods?" The architecture document has multiple parts, some of which are simply informative (such as explaining how we organized the documents in this set). The more architectural bit involves a description of "how all of this is expected to work from the user perspective." The Basic Card Payment spec is an example of the sort of spec we anticipate for each new payment method that people wish to use via the API. It describes (in this case) the required inputs and outputs for handling card payments. Anyone will be able to publish this sort of spec to tell the world how to support different payment methods interoperably through this API. (I do not yet know how many such payment method specs the WG itself will publish.) We will also want to engage the TAG around "payment app registration" but we do not yet have a spec for it. Thanks again, Ian --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/109#issuecomment-202891092
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2016 13:23:28 UTC