- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 01:56:23 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/265/r57690941@github.com>
> @@ -2036,6 +2040,18 @@ <h4 id="should-response-to-request-be-blocked-due-to-nosniff?"><dfn title="shoul > <span title=concept-network-error>network error</span> and > <var>response</var> is not a > <span title=concept-filtered-response>filtered response</span>, set > + <var>response</var>'s > + <span title=concept-response-cors-exposed-headers-list>CORS-exposed headers list</span> to the result of > + <span title=concept-header-parse>parsing</span> > + `<code title=http-access-control-expose-headers>Access-Control-Expose-Headers</code>` in > + <var>response</var>'s > + <span title=concept-response-header-list>header list</span>. > + > + <li> > + <p>If <var>response</var> is not a > + <span title=concept-network-error>network error</span> and > + <var>response</var> is not a > + <span title=concept-filtered-response>filtered response</span>, set I think we should try to find a solution that creates a CORS filtered response in a single step. Or at least a set of steps that belong together. E.g., the check for network error and filtered response is only needed once, you could then run substeps. But maybe there's a way to do the `<dl>` differently as well that cleans this up a bit. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/265/files/8c2a9dd538585584b4caeaa93f3c1f1e8b5a6239#r57690941
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2016 08:56:53 UTC