- From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:53:09 -0700
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:53:36 UTC
My initial gut feeling would be to explicitly handle the "update() call during install event" case and do case (a) for aggregation. I'm not sure I like keeping state around just in case someone calls update(). I think case (a) is also closer to what devs might expect. If I see a previous update() promise resolve, and then immediately call update() again, I think I would expect a second update process to run. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/853#issuecomment-200921447
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2016 16:53:36 UTC