- From: Simon Pieters <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 03:59:38 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2016 11:00:13 UTC
tl;dr: I can live with different parsing for `slot` and custom elements. Rendering of `<table><custom-foo><tr><td>...` would indeed be broken unless it's `display:contents` by default, at least when it's a child of table/tbody/tfoot/thead/tr. If people working on this see a clear benefit for `template`-like parsing for `slot` but less benefit and higher risk for custom elements, I don't want to block making `slot` as useful as it can be. I just wanted to point out that enabling it could lead to developers opting to abuse the element for other purposes than what `slot` was intended for to get better parsing when what they actually wanted was a custom element. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/59#issuecomment-200296711
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2016 11:00:13 UTC