- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:43:30 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 18 March 2016 16:43:57 UTC
Sure, and those that are standardized/interoperable make it to this list. I guess I could acknowledge that some implementations chose not to follow the specification and that for the schemes for which that is true it's a "chose your own adventure". Anyway, even if there were more schemes and it was open-ended, each scheme would still be required to have a specification that defines how it creates a response, including HTTPS state, so I'm not sure how to satisfy the request. Unless there's classes of schemes that could have some kind of code reuse perhaps? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/255#issuecomment-198446559
Received on Friday, 18 March 2016 16:43:57 UTC