- From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:02:17 -0700
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:02:45 UTC
> Yeah, that sounds reasonable. (And would indeed map to some kind of structured clone operation in an all-JavaScript-world.) Except that "cloning" implies that the original object is still usable. This is consuming the original object. Maybe I'm splitting hairs, but I think its an important distinction and differs from what structured cloning normally does AFAIK. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/850#issuecomment-197974888
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2016 17:02:45 UTC