Re: [webcomponents] Shadow DOM and "insertion steps" / "removing steps" (#438)

Looks good. Thank you.

BTW, I am totally okay to have ` host-including ancestor`, `shadow-root-including descendant`, `shadow-host-including inclusive ancestor` and so on, as a replacement of `composed-xxx`.

Do you have any feeling when you used these terms in DOM Standard? If you felt good, I think that's a good news and we can use these terms.



---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/438#issuecomment-197744849