- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:03:43 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2016 15:04:10 UTC
I don't think this is worth stressing over very much. I'd say that the intent is that objects with the given brand are called nodes. As such I guess ShadowRoot is redundant with DocumentFragment, although not really in a bad way. Maybe change it to "DocumentFragment (including ShadowRoot)" or something. But CharacterData might not be right, since if somehow a bare CharacterData object were constructed, it shouldn't count as a Node. On the other hand maybe it's fine to say CharacterData since as long as no specs create CharacterData instances we'll be safe. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/190#issuecomment-196862928
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2016 15:04:10 UTC